1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 26, 2023
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 26, 2023

Democracy and the Corporation: The Long View

Abstract

There is an unexamined paradox in the history of government in the West. The so-called absolutist monarchs of Europe overwhelmingly chartered republican corporations—e.g., towns, universities, and guilds whose members elected their leaders. Indeed, modern constitutional democracy is patterned after them. Yet, modern democracies themselves have overwhelmingly chartered authoritarian corporations—e.g., universities and business corporations whose subjects have no vote. After this Great Inversion, corporations, which once distributed power and wealth, now concentrate them, straining constitutional democracy. Against this backdrop, this article analyzes the major types of relation maintained between states and corporations: constitutive (states charter corporations), mimetic (states and corporations recurrently copy one another's organizational features), and instrumental (each leans on the other, and sometimes captures it, to better advance its own purposes). The article then examines the special challenges that corporate economies pose to constitutional democracy and considers whether a partial reversal of the Great Inversion could reduce them.

Keyword(s): constitutionalism, corporation, democracy, enterprise foundation, inequality, republicanism
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-113010
2023-06-15
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/26/1/annurev-polisci-051120-113010.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-113010&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adams J. 2007. The Familial State: Ruling Families and Merchant Capitalism in Early Modern Europe Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  2. Anonymous 2015. 1702. The Law of Corporations Facsimile Publisher
  3. Arrighi G. 2010. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of Our Times Brooklyn, NY: Verso
  4. Bank of Augusta v. Earle 38 U.S. 519 1839.)
  5. Barsky RB, Kilian L. 2001. Do we really know that oil caused the great stagflation? A monetary alternative. NBER Macroecon. Annu. 16:137–83
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bensel R. 2000. The Political Economy of American Industrialization, 1877–1900. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Berman H. 1983. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  8. Berle AA, Means G. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property New York: Macmillan
  9. Bilder MS. 2006. The corporate origins of judicial review. Yale Law J. 116:502–66
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Black A. 2003. Guild and State: European Thought from the Twelfth Century to the Present New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction
  11. Blackstone W. 1765–1769. Commentaries on the Laws of England Oxford, UK: Clarendon
  12. Blair M, Pollman E. 2015. The derivative nature of corporate constitutional rights. William Mary Law Rev. 56:1673
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bowie N. 2019. Why the Constitution was written down. Stanford Law Rev. 71:1397–1508
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Brenner R. 1993. Merchants and Revolution: Commercial Change, Political Conflict, and London's Overseas Traders, 1550–1653 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  15. Brentano L 1870. English Gilds: The Original Ordinances of More Than One Hundred Early English Gilds Bristol, UK: Early English Text Soc.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Brick H. 2015. Transcending Capitalism: Visions of a New Society in Modern American Thought Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  17. Brunsson N, Sahlin-Andersson K. 2000. Constructing organizations: the example of public sector reform. Organ. Stud. 21:4721–46
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Burrow JW. 1985. Whigs and Liberals: Continuity and Change in English Political Thought Oxford, UK: Clarendon
  19. Butler H. 1985. Nineteenth-century jurisdictional competition in the granting of corporate privileges. J. Legal Stud. 14:1129–66
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Butterfield K. 2015. The Making of Tocqueville's America: Law and Association in the Early United States Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  21. Canning JP. 1980. The corporation in the thought of the Italian jurists. Hist. Political Thought 1:19–32
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Carruthers B, Lamoreaux N. 2016. Regulatory races: the effects of jurisdictional competition on regulatory standards. J. Econ. Lit. 54:152–97
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Cary W. 1974. Federalism and corporate law: reflections upon Delaware. Yale Law J. 83:4663–705
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Ciepley D. 2013a. Beyond public and private: toward a political theory of the corporation. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 107:1139–58
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Ciepley D. 2013b. Neither persons nor associations: against constitutional rights for corporations. J. Law Courts 1:2221–46
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Ciepley D. 2014. The corporate roots of the liberal democratic state Work. Pap., Soc. Sci. Res. Netw . http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4350951
     [Crossref]
  27. Ciepley D. 2017. Is the U.S. government a corporation? The corporate origins of modern constitutionalism. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 111:2418–35
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Ciepley D. 2019a. Can corporations be held to the public interest, or even to the law?. J. Bus. Ethics 154:41003–18
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Ciepley D 2019b. The neoliberal corporation. Oxford Handbook of the Corporation T Clarke, J O'Brien, CRT O'Kelley 274–96. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Ciepley D. 2020. The Anglo-American misconception of stockholders as owners and members: its origins and consequences. J. Inst. Econ. 16:5623–42
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Ciepley D. 2021. Governing people or governing property? How Dartmouth College assimilated the corporation to liberalism by treating it as a trust Work. Pap., Soc. Sci. Res. Netw. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3796298
     [Crossref]
  32. Ciepley D. 2023. The juridical person of the state. States, Firms and their Legal Fictions: Attributing Identity and Responsibility to Artificial Entities M Durkee Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. In press
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission 558 U.S. 310 2010.)
  34. Coffee JC Jr 1981.. “ No soul to damn: no body to kick”: an unscandalized inquiry into the problem of corporate punishment. Mich. Law Rev. 79:3386–459
     [Google Scholar]
  35. County of San Mateo v. Southern Pacific R 13 F. 722 1882.)
  36. Dahl RA. 1985. A Preface to Economic Democracy Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  37. Dartmouth College v. Woodward 17 U.S 510:518 1819.)
  38. Davis JP. 2000. 1905. Corporations: A Study of the Origin and Development of Great Business Combinations and of Their Relation to the Authority of the State Fairless Hills, PA: Beard Books
  39. Dilliard I. 1941. Mr. Justice Brandeis, Great American St. Louis: Modern View
  40. Dodd M. 1954. American Business Corporations Until 1860 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  41. Drutman L. 2015. The Business of America Is Lobbying: How Corporations Became Politicized and Politics Became More Corporate New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  42. Easterbrook FH, Fischel DR. 1991. The Economic Structure of Corporate Law Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  43. Ferreras I, Battilana J, Méda D. 2022. Democratizing Work: The Case for Reorganizing the Economy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  44. Frega R, Herzog L, Neuhäuser C. 2019. Workplace democracy—the recent debate. Philos. Compass 14:4e12574
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Friedman M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  46. Gabbatt A. 2021. Almost one in three of Republicans say violence may be necessary to ‘save’ US. The Guardian Nov. 1. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/nov/01/republicans-violence-save-us-poll
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Gelderblom O, De Jong A, Jonker J. 2013. The formative years of the modern corporation: the Dutch East India Company VOC, 1602–1623. J. Econ. Hist. 73:41050–76
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Gerlsbeck F, Herzog L. 2020. The epistemic potentials of workplace democracy. Rev. Soc. Econ. 3:307–30
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Gevurtz FA. 2004. The historical and political origins of the corporate board of directors. Hofstra Law Rev. 33:89–173
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Gierke O. 1990. 1868. Community in Historical Perspective: A Translation of Selections from Das Deutsche Genossenschaftsrecht (The German Law of Fellowship) A Black, transl. M Fischer Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  51. Gierke O. 1987. 1900. Political Theories of the Middle Age, transl FW Maitland. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Grandy C. 1989. New Jersey corporate chartermongering, 1875–1925. J. Econ. Hist. 49:3677–92
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Greenwood D. 2015. Person, state or not: the place of business corporations in our constitutional order. Univ. Colo. Law Rev. 87:2351–435
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Hacker JS. 2019. The Great Risk Shift: The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  55. Hacker JS, Pierson P. 2011. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer—and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class New York: Simon & Schuster
  56. Hager M. 1989. Bodies politic: the progressive history of organizational “real entity” theory. Univ. Pittsburgh Law Rev. 50:2575–654
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Handlin O, Handlin MF. 1987. Commonwealth: A Study of the Role of Government in the American Economy: Massachusetts1774–1861. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Hansmann H, Kraakman R. 2000. The essential role of organizational law. Yale Law J. 110:3387–440
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Hansmann H, Kraakman R, Squire R. 2006. Law and the rise of the firm. Harvard Law Rev. 119:51333–403
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Harris R. 2000. Trusts, partnerships, and the unincorporated company. Industrializing English Law: Entrepreneurship and Business Organization, 1720–1844, pp. 137–67. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Hartz L. 2014. Economic Policy and Democratic Thought: Pennsylvania,1776–1860. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  62. Hassel A, von Verschuer S, Helmerich N. 2019. Workers’ Voice and Good Corporate Governance in Transnational Firms in Europe. Düsseldorf: Inst. Econ. Soc. Res. Hans-Böckler-Found.
  63. Hemmer N. 2016. Messengers of the Right: Conservative Media and the Transformation of American Politics Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  64. Hilt E. 2014. History of American corporate governance: law, institutions, and politics. Annu. Rev. Financial Econ. 6:1–21
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Hockett R, Omarova S. 2016. “Special,” vestigial, or visionary? What banking regulation tells us about the corporation—and vice versa. Seattle Univ. Law Rev. 39:453−500
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Honoré A. 1961. Ownership. Essays in Oxford Jurisprudence AG Guest 113–28. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Hopkins M, Lazonick W. 2016. The mismeasure of mammon: uses and abuses of executive pay data. Work. Pap. 49, Inst. New Econ. Thinking New York: https://www.ineteconomics.org/uploads/papers/WP_49-Hopkins-Lazonick-Updated.pdf
  68. Hörisch F. 2012. The macro-economic effect of codetermination on income equality Arbeitspap. 147, Mannheimer Zent. Eur. Sozialforsch., Mannheim, Ger .
  69. Horwitz M. 1992. The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960 Cambridge MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Hovenkamp H. 1991. Enterprise and American Law, 1836–1937 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  71. Hunter JD. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America New York: Basic Books
  72. Jäger S, Noy S, Schoefer B. 2022. Codetermination and power in the workplace Rep., Econ. Policy Inst. Washington, DC: https://www.epi.org/unequalpower/publications/codetermination-and-power-in-the-workplace/
  73. Jensen M, Meckling W. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financ. Econ. 3:305–60
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Kalleberg AL. 2013. Globalization and precarious work. Contemp. Sociol. J. Rev. 42:5700–6
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Kantorowicz E. 1997. 1957. The King's Two Bodies Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  76. Kaufman-Osborn T 2023. The Autocratic Academy: Re-envisioning Rule within America's Universities Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  77. Kloppenberg J. 2016. Toward Democracy New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  78. Kyd S. 1793–1794. A Treatise on the Law of Corporations, 2 vols London: J. Butterworth
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Lamoreaux N. 2016. Corporate governance and the expansion of the democratic franchise: beyond cross-country regressions. Scand. Econ. Hist. Rev. 64:2103–21
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Lazonick W. 2014. Profits without prosperity. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92:946–55
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Lee D. 2016. Popular Sovereignty in Early Modern Constitutional Thought New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  82. Levy J. 2014. Rationalism, Pluralism, and Freedom New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  83. List F. 2011 (1841). The National System of Political Economy New York: Cosimo Classics
  84. Lutz D. 1988. The Origins of American Constitutionalism Baton Rouge, LA: LSU Press
  85. Magyar B. 2016. Post-Communist Mafia State: The Case of Hungary Budapest: CEU Press
  86. Maier P. 1993. The revolutionary origins of the American corporation. William Mary Q. 50:151–84
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Maitland FW 2003. State, Trust and Corporation D Runciman, M Ryan Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  88. Maloy J. 2008. The Colonial American Origins of Modern Democratic Thought New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  89. Mann M. 1984. The autonomous power of the state: its origins, mechanisms and results. Arch. Eur. Sociol. 25:2185–213
     [Google Scholar]
  90. McCoy J, Somer M. 2019. Toward a theory of pernicious polarization and how it harms democracies: comparative evidence and possible remedies. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 681:1234–71
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Medvetz T. 2012. Think Tanks in America. Chicago: Univ Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Mills CW. 2000. The Power Elite New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  93. Mirowski P, Plehwe D, eds. 2015. The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, with a New Preface Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  94. Mishel L, Gould E, Bivens J. 2015. Wage stagnation in nine charts Rep., Econ. Policy Inst Washington, DC: https://www.epi.org/publication/charting-wage-stagnation/
  95. Morawetz V. 1882. A Treatise on the Law of Private Corporations Other than Charitable Boston: Little, Brown
  96. Morgan ES. 2006. The Puritan Dilemma: The Story of John Winthrop London: Pearson
  97. Morley J 2016. The common law corporation: the power of the trust in Anglo-American business history. Columbia Law Rev 116:2146−2198
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Murray M. 2022.. “ Anger on their minds”: NBC News poll finds sky-high interest and polarization ahead of midterms. NBC News Oct. 23. https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/first-read/anger-minds-nbc-news-poll-finds-sky-high-interest-polarization-ahead-m-rcna53512
    [Google Scholar]
  99. North D, Wallace JJ, Weingast B. 2012. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  100. Novak W 2001. The American law of association: the legal-political construction of civil society. Stud. Am. Political Dev 15:163–88
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Oakley F. 2012. The mortgage of the past: reshaping the ancient political inheritance (1050–1300). New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  102. Pateman C. 1975. Participation and Democratic Theory Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  103. Pistor K. 2019. The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  104. Plotke D. 1992. The political mobilization of business. The Politics of Interests: Interest Groups Transformed M Petracca 175−98. Boulder, CO: Westview
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Polanyi K. 2001. 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time Boston: Beacon
  106. Pollack F, Maitland F. 2013. 1898. The History of English Law Before the Time of Edward I, Vol. 1 Indianapolis: Liberty Fund
  107. Pound R. 1936. Visitatorial jurisdiction over corporations in equity. Harvard Law Rev. 49:3369–95
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Reynolds S. 1977. An Introduction to the History of English Medieval Towns New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  109. Robé J-P. 2011. The legal structure of the firm. Account. Econ. Law 1:1 https://doi.org/10.2202/2152-2820.1001
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  110. Robins N. 2003. Loot: in search of the East India Company, the world's first transnational corporation. Environ. Urban. 14:179−88
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Robins N. 2006. The Corporation that Changed the World: How the East India Company Shaped the Modern Multinational London: Pluto
  112. Rodgers D. 2011. Age of Fracture Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  113. Rodrik D. 2018. Populism and the economics of globalization. J. Int. Bus. Policy 1:112–33
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Rosenwein B. 1999. Negotiating Space: Power, Restraint, and Privileges of Immunity in Early Medieval Europe Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  115. Roy WG. 1999. Socializing Capital: The Rise of the Large Industrial Corporation in America Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  116. Ruggie JG. 2018. Multinationals as global institution: power, authority and relative autonomy. Regul. Gov. 12:317–33
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Runciman D. 2000. Is the state a corporation?. Gov. Oppos. 35:190–104
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Rydgren J 2013. Class Politics and the Radical Right Abingdon, UK: Routledge
  119. Savage L. 2021. You can have billionaires or you can have democracy: an interview with Chuck Collins. Jacobin Mag., June 22. https://www.jacobinmag.com/2021/06/billionaire-class-superrich-oligarchy-inheritance-wealth-inequality
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Schwartz H. 2019. States Versus Markets: Understanding the Global Economy London: Macmillan
  121. Seavoy R. 1982. The Origins of the American Business Corporation, 1784–1855: Broadening the Concept of Public Service During Industrialization. Westport, CT: Greenwood
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Skinner Q. 1978. Foundations of Modern Political Thought Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  123. Skinner Q. 2009. A genealogy of the modern state. Proc. Br. Acad. 162:325–70
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Skinner Q. 2018. From Humanism to Hobbes Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  125. Smith A. 1976. 1776.). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  126. Speir I. 2012. Corporations, the original understanding, and the problem of power. Georgetown J. Law Public Policy 10:115−83
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Steffans L. 1905. New Jersey: a traitor state. Apr McClure's Mag.
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Swedish Companies Act 2005. https://studylib.net/doc/8708592/swedish-companies-act
  129. Talbot P. 2003. Management organisational history—a military lesson?. J. Eur. Ind. Train. 27:7330–40
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Teles SM. 2008. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  131. Thomsen S. 2017. The Danish Industrial Foundations Copenhagen: Djøf
  132. Tierney B. 1955. The Foundations of Conciliar Theory: The Contribution of the Medieval Canonists from Gratian to the Great Schism New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  133. Tierney B. 1982. Religion, Law and the Growth of Constitutional Thought 1150–1650 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Tocqueville A de 2006. 1856. The Ancien Régime and the French Revolution J Elster, transl. A Goldhammer New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  135. van Bavel B. 2016. The Invisible Hand? How Market Economies Have Emerged and Declined Since AD 500 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  136. Wallis JJ. 2005. Constitutions, corporations, and corruption: American states and constitutional change, 1842–1852. J. Econ. Hist. 65:1211–56
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Wilson J. 2007. 1804. Collected Works of James Wilson, 2 vols Indianapolis: Liberty Fund
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Wood GS. 1969. The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–87 Chapel Hill: Univ. North Carolina Press
  139. Wood GS. 1993. The Radicalism of the American Revolution New York: Vintage
  140. World Bank 2019. Gini index—European Union. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI?locations=EU
  141. Wright RE. 2013. Corporation Nation Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  142. Yergin D, Stanislaw J 1998. Commanding Heights New York: Simon & Schuster
  143. Zhang T, Morley J. 2023. The modern state and the rise of the business corporation. Yale Law J. 132: press
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-113010
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error