1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 26, 2023
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 26, 2023

Political Inequality in Rich Democracies

Abstract

In this review, we focus on political inequality in rich democracies. In the two main sections, we look at participation and representation, respectively. The former discusses whether rising income inequality and the weakening of trade unions have led to higher levels of inequality in participation. The latter looks at substantive and descriptive representation and asks how they might be linked. Research highlights that people with fewer individual resources participate much less than those with more resources, and collective organizations lose their ability to counter these trends. In terms of representation, the pattern is very similar. Not only are the opinions of decision-makers more congruent with those of the better off but policy choices also reflect their preferences more clearly. As the social distance between rulers and ruled increases, representative democracy gets more biased in favor of higher-status social groups.

Keyword(s): congruence, income inequality, participation, representation, responsiveness, trade unions
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052521-094617
2023-06-15
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/26/1/annurev-polisci-052521-094617.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052521-094617&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abizadeh A. 2021. Representation, bicameralism, political equality, and sortition: reconstituting the Second Chamber as a randomly selected assembly. Perspect. Politics 19:3791–806
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Acemoglu D, Robinson JA. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  3. Adams J, Ezrow L. 2009. Who do European parties represent? How western European parties represent the policy preferences of opinion leaders. J. Politics 71:1206–23
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahlquist JS. 2017. Labor unions, political representation, and economic inequality. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 20:409–32
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Alderson AS, Nielsen F. 2002. Globalization and the great U-turn: income inequality trends in 16 OECD countries. Am. J. Sociol. 107:51244–99
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Alexadiou D. 2022. Cabinet ministers and inequality. Eur. J. Political Res. 61:2326–50
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Allern EH, Bale T 2017. The relationship between left-of-centre parties and trade unions. Left-of-Centre Parties and Trade Unions in the Twenty-First Century EH Allern, T Bale 1–25. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Anderson CJ, Beramendi P 2008. Income, inequality, and electoral participation. Democracy, Inequality, and Representation: A Comparative Perspective P Beramendi, CJ Anderson 278–311. New York: Russell Sage Found.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Armingeon K, Schädel L. 2015. Social inequality in political participation: the dark sides of individualisation. West Eur. Politics 38:11–27
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Arzheimer K. 2008. Something old, something new, something borrowed, something true? A comment on Lister's ‘Institutions, Inequality and Social Norms: Explaining Variations in Participation’. Br. J. Politics Int. Relat. 10:4681–97
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Aytaç SE, Stokes SC. 2019. Why Bother? Rethinking Participation in Elections and Protests Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  12. Baccaro L, Howell C. 2011. A common neoliberal trajectory: the transformation of industrial relations in advanced capitalism. Politics Soc. 39:4521–63
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Barnes TD, Beall VD, Holman MR. 2021. Pink-collar representation and budgetary outcomes in US states. Legis. Stud. 46:1119–54
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Bartels LM. 2008. Unequal Democracy. The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Beramendi P, Besley T, Levi M. 2022. Political equality: What is it and why does it matter?. IFS Deaton Rev. Inequal. https://ifs.org.uk/inequality/political-equality-what-is-it-and-why-does-it-matter/
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bernauer J, Giger N, Rosset J. 2015. Mind the gap: Do proportional electoral systems foster a more equal representation of women and men, poor and rich?. Int. Political Sci. Rev. 36:178–98
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Boix C. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  18. Boräng F, Naurin D. 2022. Political equality and substantive representation by interest groups. Br. J. Political Sci. 52:31447–54
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Borwein S. 2021. Do ministers’ occupational and social class backgrounds influence social spending?. Politics Groups Identities 10:558–80
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Bovens M, Wille A. 2017. Diploma Democracy: The Rise of Political Meritocracy Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  21. Bowman J. 2020. Do the affluent override average Americans? Measuring policy disagreement and unequal influence. Soc. Sci. Q. 101:31018–37
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Brady HE. 2004. An analytical perspective on participatory inequality and income inequality. Social Inequality KM Neckerman 667–702. New York: Russell Sage Found.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Brady HE, Verba S, Schlozman KL. 1995. Beyond SES: a resource model of political participation. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 89:2271–94
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Brandolini A, Smeeding TM. 2008. Inequality patterns in western democracies: cross-country differences and changes over time. Democracy, Inequality, and Representation P Beramendi, CJ Anderson 25–61. New York: Russell Sage Found.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Branham J, Soroka SN, Wlezien C. 2017. When do the rich win?. Political Sci. Q. 132:143–62
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Brennan J. 2017. Against Democracy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  27. Burden BC, Wichowsky A. 2014. Economic discontent as a mobilizer: unemployment and voter turnout. J. Politics 76:4887–98
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Caplan B. 2007. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  29. Carnes N. 2012. Does the numerical underrepresentation of the working class in Congress matter?. Legis. Stud. Q. 37:15–34
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Carnes N. 2018. The Cash Ceiling: Why Only the Rich Run for Office—and What We Can Do About It Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Carnes N, Lupu N. 2015. Rethinking the comparative perspective on class and representation: evidence from Latin America. Am. J. Political Sci. 59:11–18
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Carnes N, Lupu N. 2023. The economic backgrounds of politicians. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 26:253–70
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Chancel L, Piketty T. 2021. Global income inequality, 1820–2020: the persistence and mutation of extreme inequality. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 19:63025–62
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Dahl RA. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  35. Dalton RJ. 2017. The Participation Gap: Social Status and Political Inequality Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Dassonneville R, Hooghe M. 2017. Voter turnout decline and stratification: quasi-experimental and comparative evidence of a growing educational gap. Politics 37:2184–200
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Donnelly M, Lefkofridi Z. 2014. Economic and political inequality in modern democracies: differential responsiveness to the policy preferences of economic classes EUI Work. Pap. 2014/13, European Univ. Inst. Florence, Italy:
  38. Draut T. 2016. Sleeping Giant: How the New Working Class Will Transform America New York/London: Doubleday
  39. Elkjær MA. 2020. What drives unequal policy responsiveness? Assessing the role of informational asymmetries in economic policy-making. Comp. Political Stud. 53:142213–45
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Elkjær MA, Iversen T. 2020. The political representation of economic interests. World Politics 72:2254–90
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Elkjær MA, Iversen T. 2023. The democratic state and redistribution: Whose interests are served?. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 117:2391–406
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Elkjær MA, Klitgaard MB. 2021. Economic inequality and political responsiveness: a systematic review. Perspect. Politics. In press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721002188
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Elsässer L, Hense S, Schäfer A. 2021. Not just money: unequal responsiveness in egalitarian democracies. J. Eur. Public Policy 28:121890–908
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Elsässer L, Schäfer A. 2022. (N)one of us? The case for descriptive representation of the contemporary working class. West Eur. Politics 45:1361–84
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Enns PK. 2015. Relative policy support and coincidental representation. Perspect. Politics 13:41053–64
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Erikson RS. 2015. Income inequality and policy responsiveness. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 18:11–29
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Flavin P. 2012. Income inequality and policy representation in the American states. Am. Politics Res. 40:129–59
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Flavin P, Radcliff B. 2011. Labor union membership and voting across nations. Elect. Stud. 30:4633–41
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Galbraith JK, Hale JT. 2008. State income inequality and presidential election turnout and outcomes. Soc. Sci. Q. 89:4887–901
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Gallego A. 2010. Understanding unequal turnout: education and voting in comparative perspective. Elect. Stud. 29:2239–48
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Gallego A. 2015. Unequal Political Participation Worldwide New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  52. Giger N, Rosset J, Bernauer J. 2012. The poor political representation of the poor in a comparative perspective. Representation 48:147–61
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Gilens M. 2005. Inequality and democratic responsiveness. Public Opin. Q. 69:5778–96
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Gilens M. 2009. Preference gaps and inequality in representation. Political Sci. Politics 42:2335–41
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Gilens M. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America New York: Russell Sage Found.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Gimpelson V, Treisman D. 2018. Misperceiving inequality. Econ. Politics 30:127–54
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Gingrich J, Häusermann S. 2015. The decline of the working-class vote, the reconfiguration of the welfare support coalition and consequences for the welfare state. J. Eur. Soc. Policy 25:150–75
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Goodin R, Dryzek J. 1980. Rational participation: the politics of relative power. Br. J. Political Sci. 10:3273–92
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Gray M, Caul M. 2000. Declining voter turnout in advanced industrial democracies, 1950 to 1997: the effects of declining group mobilization. Comp. Political Stud. 33:91091–122
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Grumbach JM. 2015. Does the American Dream matter for members of congress? Social-class backgrounds and roll-call votes. Political Res. Q. 68:2306–23
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Han KJ. 2016. Income inequality and voting for radical right-wing parties. Elect. Stud. 42:54–64
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Hassel A 2015. Trade unions and the future of democratic capitalism. Politics of Advanced Capitalism P Beramendi, S Häusermann, H Kitschelt, H Kriesi 231–59. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Häusermann S, Pinggera M, Ares M, Enggist M. 2021. Class and social policy in the knowledge economy. Eur. J. Political Res. 61:2462–84
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Hayo B, Neumeier F. 2012. Leaders’ impact on public spending priorities: the case of the German Laender. Kyklos 65:4480–511
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Heath O. 2018. Policy alienation, social alienation and working-class abstention in Britain, 1964–2010. Br. J. Political Sci. 48:41053–73
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Hemingway A. 2022. Does class shape legislators’ approach to inequality and economic policy? A comparative view. Gov. Oppos. 57:184–107
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Höhmann D. 2020. When do men represent women's interests in parliament? How the presence of women in parliament affects the legislative behavior of male politicians. Schweiz. Z. Politics 26:131–50
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Horn D. 2011. Income inequality and voter turnout: evidence from European national elections. GINI Discuss. Pap. 16, Amsterdam
  69. Houle C. 2018. Does economic inequality breed political inequality?. Democratization 25:81500–18
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Huber E, Huo J, Stephens JD. 2019. Power, policy, and top income shares. Socio-Econ. Rev. 17:2231–53
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Ingham S. 2022. Representative democracy and social equality. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 116:2689–701
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Jensen C, Jespersen BB. 2017. To have or not to have: effects of economic inequality on turnout in European democracies. Elect. Stud. 45:24–28
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Kaase M, Marsh A 1979. Distribution of political action. Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies SH Barnes, M Kaase 167–201. London: Sage
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Kerrissey J, Schofer E. 2013. Union membership and political participation in the United States. Soc. Forces 91:3895–928
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Kim D. 2016. Labor unions and minority group members’ voter turnout. Soc. Sci. Q. 97:51208–26
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Kim SE, Margalit Y. 2017. Informed preferences? The impact of unions on workers’ policy views. Am. J. Political Sci. 61:3728–43
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Leighley JE, Nagler J. 2007. Unions, voter turnout, and class bias in the U.S. electorate, 1964–2004. J. Politics 69:2430–41
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Leininger A, Meijers MJ. 2020. Do populist parties increase voter turnout? Evidence from over 40 years of electoral history in 31 European democracies. Political Stud. 69:3665–85
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Levi M. 2003. Organizing power: the prospects for an American labor movement. Perspect. Politics 1:145–68
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Lijphart A. 1997. Unequal participation: democracy's unresolved dilemma. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 91:11–14
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Lister M. 2007. Institutions, inequality and social norms: explaining variations in participation. Br. J. Politics Int. Relat. 9:20–35
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Lupu N, Tirado Castro A 2022. Unequal policy responsiveness in Spain. Socio-Econ. Rev. In press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwac040
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Lupu N, Warner Z. 2022. Affluence and congruence: unequal representation around the world. J. Politics 84:1276–90
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Macdonald D. 2021a. How labor unions increase political knowledge: evidence from the United States. Political Behav. 43:11–24
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Macdonald D. 2021b. When does inequality demobilize? New evidence from the American states. Elect. Stud. 70:102282
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Mahler VA. 2002. Exploring the subnational dimension of income inequality: an analysis of the relationship between inequality and electoral turnout in the developed countries. Int. Stud. Q. 46:1117–42
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Manin B. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  88. Mansbridge J. 1999. Should Blacks represent Blacks and women represent women? A contingent “yes.”. J. Politics 61:3628–57
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Mathisen RB. 2023. Affluence and influence in a social democracy. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 117:2751–58
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Mathisen RB, Schakel W, Hense S, Elsässer L, Persson M, Pontusson J. 2021. Unequal responsiveness and government partisanship in northwest Europe Unequal Democr. Work. Pap. 31 Univ. Geneva https://unequaldemocracies.unige.ch/files/1616/3775/1413/wp31.pdf
  91. Miller WE, Stokes DE. 1963. Constituency influence in Congress. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 57:145–56
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Oesch D 2006. Redrawing the Class Map: Stratification and Institutions in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  93. O'Grady T. 2019. Careerists versus coal-miners: welfare reforms and the substantive representation of social groups in the British Labour Party. Comp. Political Stud. 52:4544–78
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Pereira MM. 2021. Understanding and reducing biases in elite beliefs about the electorate. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 115:41308–24
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Persson M. 2013. Is the effect of education on voter turnout absolute or relative? A multi-level analysis of 37 countries. J. Elect. Public Opin. Parties 23:2111–33
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Persson M. 2021. From opinions to policies: examining the links between citizens, representatives, and policy change. Elect. Stud. 74:102413
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Persson M, Solevid M, Öhrvall R. 2013. Voter turnout and political equality: testing the ‘law of dispersion’ in a Swedish natural experiment. Politics 33:3172–84
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Phillips A. 1995. The Politics of Presence: The Political Representation of Gender, Ethnicity, and Race Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  99. Pitkin HF. 1967. The Concept of Representation Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  100. Polacko M. 2022. Inequality, policy polarization and the income gap in turnout. Party Politics 28:4739–54
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Polacko M, Heath O, Lewis-Beck MS, Dassonneville R. 2021. Policy polarization, income inequality and turnout. Political Stud. 69:2455–77
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Pontusson J. 2013. Unionization, inequality and redistribution. Br. J. Ind. Relat. 51:4797–825
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Pontusson J, Rueda D. 2010. The politics of inequality: voter mobilization and left parties in advanced industrial states. Comp. Political Stud. 43:6675–705
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Radcliff B, Davis P. 2000. Labor organization and electoral participation in industrial democracies. Am. J. Political Sci. 44:1132–41
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Rosenfeld J. 2014. What Unions No Longer Do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  106. Rosenstone SJ, Hansen JM. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America New York: Macmillan
  107. Rosset J. 2013. Are the policy preferences of relatively poor citizens under-represented in the Swiss Parliament?. J. Legis. Stud. 19:4490–504
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Rosset J, Stecker C. 2019. How well are citizens represented by their governments? Issue congruence and inequality in Europe. Eur. Political Sci. Rev. 11:2145–60
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Sandel MJ. 2020. The Tyranny of Merit: What's Become of the Common Good? New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux
  110. Scervini F, Segatti P. 2012. Education, inequality and electoral participation. Res. Soc. Stratif. Mobil. 30:4403–13
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Schäfer A 2013. Liberalization, inequality and democracy's discontents. Politics in the Age of Austerity A Schäfer, W Streeck 169–95. Cambridge, UK: Polity
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Schäfer A, Roßteutscher S, Abendschön S. 2020. Rising start-up costs of voting: political inequality among first-time voters. West Eur. Politics 43:4819–44
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Schäfer A, Schwander H. 2019. ‘Don't play if you can't win’: Does economic inequality undermine political equality?. Eur. Political Sci. Rev. 11:3395–413
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Schäfer A, Streeck W 2013. Introduction: politics in the age of austerity. Politics in the Age of Austerity A Schäfer, W Streeck 1–25. Cambridge, UK: Polity
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Schakel W. 2021. Unequal policy responsiveness in the Netherlands. Socio-Econ. Rev. 19:137–57
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Schakel W, Burgoon B. 2022. The party road to representation: unequal responsiveness in party platforms. Eur. J. Political Res. 61:304–25
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Schakel W, Hakhverdian A. 2018. Ideological congruence and socio-economic inequality. Eur. Political Sci. Rev. 10:3441–65
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Schakel W, van der Pas DJ. 2021. Degrees of influence: educational inequality in policy representation. Eur. J. Political Res. 60:2418–37
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Schlozman KL, Verba S, Brady HE. 2014. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  120. Sevenans J, Soontjens K, Walgrave S. 2022. Inequality in the public priority perceptions of elected representatives. West Eur. Politics 45:51057–80
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Shapiro I. 2002. Why the poor don't soak the rich. Daedalus 131:1118–28
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Smets K, van Ham C. 2013. The embarrassment of riches? A meta-analysis of individual-level research on voter turnout. Elect. Stud. 32:2344–59
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Solt F. 2008. Economic inequality and democratic political engagement. Am. J. Political. Sci. 52:148–60
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Solt F. 2010. Does economic inequality depress electoral participation? Testing the Schattschneider hypothesis. Political Behav. 32:285–301
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Soroka SN, Wlezien C. 2008. On the limits to inequality in representation. Political Sci. Politics 41:2319–27
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Stockemer D, Parent S. 2014. The inequality turnout nexus: new evidence from presidential elections. Politics Policy 42:2221–45
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Stockemer D, Scruggs L. 2012. Income inequality, development and electoral turnout—new evidence on a burgeoning debate. Elect. Stud. 31:4764–73
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Streeck W. 2009. Re-Forming Capitalism: Institutional Change in the German Political Economy Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  129. Szewczyk J, Crowder-Meyer M. 2022. Community income inequality and the economic gap in participation. Political Behav. 44:2479–504
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Tingsten H. 1975. Political Behavior: Studies in Election Statistics London: Arno
  131. Topf R 1995. Electoral participation. Citizens and the State H-D Klingemann, D Fuchs 27–51. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Traber D, Hänni M, Giger N, Breunig C. 2022. Social status, political priorities and unequal representation. Eur. J. Political Res. 61:2351–73
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Verba S. 2003. Would the dream of political equality turn out to be a nightmare?. Perspect. Politics 1:4663–79
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Verba S, Nie NH, Kim J. 1978. Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  135. Volden C, Wiseman AE, Wittmer DE. 2018. Women's issues and their fates in the US Congress. Political Sci. Res. Methods 6:4679–96
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Wängnerud L. 2009. Women in parliaments: descriptive and substantive representation. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 12:51–69
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Western B, Rosenfeld J. 2011. Unions, norms, and the rise in U.S. wage inequality. Am. Sociol. Rev. 76:4513–37
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Wichowsky A. 2012. Competition, party dollars, and income bias in voter turnout, 1980–2008. J. Politics 74:2446–59
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Williams MS. 1998. Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052521-094617
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error